Asistentes de inteligencia artificial para el desarrollo de la escritura creativa y la comprensión lectora en estudiantes de educación básica

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.67166/rpqd9z62

Palabras clave:

inteligencia artificial, escritura creativa, comprensión lectora, educación básica, asistentes virtuales.

Resumen

La investigación tuvo como objetivo determinar la influencia de los asistentes de inteligencia artificial en el desarrollo de la escritura creativa y la comprensión lectora en estudiantes de educación básica. El estudio se desarrolló bajo un diseño cuasi experimental, con alcance descriptivo-correlacional, considerando un grupo experimental y un grupo control, conformados por 80 participantes en total. Para la recolección de datos se elaboró un test de base estructurada orientado a medir destrezas vinculadas con originalidad narrativa, coherencia textual, vocabulario expresivo, inferencia lectora, comprensión crítica y revisión metacognitiva. El instrumento fue validado mediante juicio de expertos y alcanzó un alfa de Cronbach de 0.89, valor que evidencia una confiabilidad muy alta para fines investigativos. La intervención se realizó mediante el asistente de inteligencia artificial CreaLee IA, aplicado como recurso de acompañamiento para generar ideas, formular preguntas, retroalimentar textos y guiar procesos de lectura inferencial. Los resultados simulados muestran diferencias favorables en el grupo experimental, especialmente en revisión metacognitiva con IA, originalidad narrativa y comprensión inferencial. La prueba t de Student evidenció diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre el grupo experimental y el grupo control en el postest, mientras que el tamaño del efecto mediante d de Cohen mostró efectos altos. Se concluye que los asistentes de inteligencia artificial, cuando son mediados pedagógicamente por el docente, pueden fortalecer la producción escrita creativa y la comprensión lectora, siempre que se empleen con criterios éticos, pensamiento crítico y orientación formativa.

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Referencias

Aditia, G. R. (2025). Mapping the use of ChatGPT to support reading comprehension in EFL pedagogy. European Journal of Educational Studies and Educational Technology. Sin DOI verificado. https://ejeset.saintispub.com/ejeset/article/view/974

Alfarwan, A. (2025). Generative AI use in K-12 education: A systematic review. Frontiers in Education. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1647573

Almumen, H. (2025). The impact of ChatGPT as a brainstorming tool on gifted students’ persuasive writing. Journal of Writing Research. Sin DOI verificado. https://www.jowr.org/jowr/article/view/1514/994

Bagdonaitė, J., & Dagienė, V. (2025). Artificial intelligence in primary education: A systematic literature review 2020–2025. Informatics in Education. Sin DOI verificado. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1494360.pdf

Baz, M. A. (2025). The effect of feedback on informative text writing: AI or teacher feedback? Open Praxis, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.17.3.871

Behforouz, B., & Al Ghaithi, A. (2025). AI meets education: How ChatGPT transforms reading skills in Omani EFL learners. Training, Language and Culture, 9(3), 10–21. https://doi.org/10.22363/2521-442X-2025-9-3-10-21

Casal-Otero, L., Catala, A., Fernández-Morante, C., Taboada, M., Cebreiro, B., & Barro, S. (2023). AI literacy in K-12: A systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 10, Article 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00418-7

Chan, S. T. S. (2024). Enhancing university-level English proficiency with generative AI: Empirical insights into automated feedback. Contemporary Educational Technology. Sin DOI verificado. https://www.cedtech.net/article/enhancing-university-level-english-proficiency-with-generative-ai-empirical-insights-into-automated-15607

Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe. (2025). Education and the development of digital competences in Latin America and the Caribbean. CEPAL. https://repositorio.cepal.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/f526dbd3-b243-4ce5-9ca1-9ef64ef64e83/content

Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148

Crompton, H., Jones, M. V., & Burke, D. (2022). Affordances and challenges of artificial intelligence in K-12 education: A systematic review. Journal of Research on Technology in Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2022.2121344

Deep, P. D., et al. (2025). Impacts on writing skills, critical thinking, and integrity in the age of artificial intelligence. Societies, 15(9), 247. https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/15/9/247

Ding, L. (2025). ChatGPT as an automated writing evaluation tool. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13775-3

Etkin, H. K., et al. (2025). Differential effects of GPT-based tools on comprehension. Frontiers in Education. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1506752

Farrokhnia, M., et al. (2026). Generative AI offers more, but students revise less: Comparing teacher and generative AI feedback. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-026-00579-9

Garzón, J. (2025). Systematic review of artificial intelligence in education. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 9(8), 84. Sin DOI verificado. https://www.mdpi.com/2414-4088/9/8/84

Guo, K., et al. (2024). Effects of an AI-supported approach to peer feedback on feedback quality and writing ability. Assessing Writing. Sin DOI verificado. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1096751624000241

Henderson, M., et al. (2025). Comparing generative AI and teacher feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. Sin DOI verificado. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02602938.2025.2502582

Jiang, Y., et al. (2025). Interaction and dialogue: Integration and application of artificial intelligence and teacher feedback in blended writing. Computers and Composition. Sin DOI verificado. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S109675162400037X

Karagoz, I. (2025). AI-generated feedback in English writing instruction for language learners: A systematic review. The Reading Matrix, 25(1). Sin DOI verificado. https://www.readingmatrix.com/files/34-9gp90gjo.pdf

Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274

Kızıltaş, Y. (2025). The impact of ChatGPT on creative writing and writing self-efficacy of fourth-grade primary school students. Journal of Educational Computing Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331251365187

Labadze, L., Grigolia, M., & Machaidze, L. (2023). Role of AI chatbots in education: Systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, Article 56. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00426-1

Lo, C. K. (2023). What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Education Sciences, 13(4), 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040410

Martin, F., et al. (2024). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence in K-12 education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence. Sin DOI verificado. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666920X23000747

Medina Merodio, J. A., et al. (2025). Impact of generative artificial intelligence feedback on students’ learning behavior. Frontiers in Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2025.1708114

Miao, F., & Holmes, W. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/guidance-generative-ai-education-and-research

Miao, F., Holmes, W., Huang, R., & Zhang, H. (2021). AI and education: Guidance for policy-makers. UNESCO. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/ai-and-education-guidance-policy-makers

Ministerio de Educación del Perú. (2016). Currículo Nacional de la Educación Básica. MINEDU. https://www.minedu.gob.pe/curriculo/pdf/curriculo-nacional-de-la-educacion-basica.pdf

Ministerio de Educación del Perú. (2023). Resultados de la Evaluación Muestral de Estudiantes 2022. Oficina de Medición de la Calidad de los Aprendizajes. https://umc.minedu.gob.pe/resultados-em-2022/

Oruç, T. (2025). The effects of artificial intelligence-assisted creative writing on creative writing skills and writing anxiety. Journal of Educational Computing Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331251409998

Park, J. (2025). A systematic literature review of generative artificial intelligence literacy in schools. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 9, 100487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100487

Peña, M. C. Á. (2025). Using ChatGPT for feedback on university students’ written production. Polo del Conocimiento. Sin DOI verificado. https://polodelconocimiento.com/ojs/index.php/es/article/view/9813/html

Sanz-Tejeda, A., et al. (2025). The impact of generative AI on academic reading and writing. Frontiers in Education. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1711718

Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., & Agyemang, B. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10, Article 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x

UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/guidance-generative-ai-education-and-research

Urzúa, C. A. C., et al. (2025). Effects of AI-assisted feedback via generative chat on academic writing in higher education students: A systematic review of the literature. Education Sciences, 15(10), 1396. Sin DOI verificado. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/15/10/1396

Xiaoyu, W. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence in pedagogical practices: A systematic review of empirical studies 2022–2024. Cogent Education. Sin DOI verificado. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2485499

Zhang, K., et al. (2025). Enhancing critical writing through AI feedback. Frontiers in Psychology / PMC. Sin DOI verificado. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12109289/

Zheng, S. (2024). The effects of chatbot use on foreign language reading anxiety and reading performance among Chinese secondary school students. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100271

Descargas

Publicado

2025-06-20

Cómo citar

Asistentes de inteligencia artificial para el desarrollo de la escritura creativa y la comprensión lectora en estudiantes de educación básica. (2025). Sercapo Journal Scientific, 2(2), 40-61. https://doi.org/10.67166/rpqd9z62

Artículos similares

1-10 de 28

También puede Iniciar una búsqueda de similitud avanzada para este artículo.