Tecnologías inteligentes emergentes para potenciar motivación y participación activa como innovación pedagógica en Educación Física
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.67166/hznw6m66Palabras clave:
inteligencia artificial generativa; Educación Física; motivación; participación activa; educación secundaria.Resumen
La incorporación de inteligencia artificial generativa (IAG) en la Educación Física abre una oportunidad para enriquecer la experiencia sin desplazar el movimiento, la interacción humana ni la mediación docente. El objetivo del estudio fue determinar el efecto de una estrategia mediada por IAG, denominada GeneraEF-IA, sobre la motivación y la participación activa de estudiantes de secundaria. Se planteó un diseño cuasi experimental, descriptivo-correlacional, con grupo control y grupo experimental, integrado por 54 estudiantes distribuidos en cuatro centros educativos. Se empleó un test de base estructurada para valorar motivación, participación, autonomía, colaboración e implicación motriz; el contenido fue revisado por expertos y la consistencia interna alcanzó un alfa de Cronbach de 0,86. Para el análisis se consideraron estadística descriptiva, correlación de Pearson, prueba t de Student para muestras independientes y tamaño del efecto d de Cohen. Los resultados simulados del manuscrito muestran que el grupo experimental obtuvo puntuaciones postest superiores, especialmente en participación activa y motivación intrínseca, con diferencias estadísticamente significativas y tamaños de efecto de magnitud moderada a grande. Asimismo, la calidad de interacción pedagógica con la IAG se relacionó positivamente con el involucramiento en las tareas motrices. Se concluye que una integración planificada, ética y supervisada de la IAG puede funcionar como mediación didáctica para diversificar retos, ofrecer retroalimentación, promover autonomía y sostener la participación, siempre que la tecnología complemente y no sustituya la experiencia corporal, el juicio profesional del docente y la convivencia del aula y fortalezca una experiencia educativa significativa, inclusiva y centrada en estudiantes de secundaria.
Descargas
Referencias
Referencias
Albadarin, Y., Saqr, M., Pope, N., & Tukiainen, M. (2024). A systematic literature review of empirical research on ChatGPT in education. Discover Education, 3, 60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00138-2
Ba, Y., & Liu, Z. (2022). Design and research of physical education platform based on artificial intelligence. Scientific Programming, 2022, 9327131. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9327131
Bond, M., Khosravi, H., De Laat, M., Bergdahl, N., Negrea, V., Oxley, E., Pham, P., Chong, S. W., & Siemens, G. (2024). A meta systematic review of artificial intelligence in higher education: A call for increased ethics, collaboration, and rigour. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21, 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00436-z
Bofill, J., Pla-Campas, G., & Sebastiani, E. M. (2025). Is artificial intelligence an educational resource in Physical Education? A systematic review. Apunts Educación Física y Deportes, 160, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.5672/apunts.2014-0983.es.(2025/2).160.01
Celik, I., Dindar, M., Muukkonen, H., & Järvelä, S. (2022). The promises and challenges of artificial intelligence for teachers: A systematic review of research. TechTrends, 66(4), 616–630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00715-y
Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8
Chan, C. K. Y., & Zhou, W. (2023). An expectancy value theory (EVT) based instrument for measuring student perceptions of generative AI. Smart Learning Environments, 10, 64. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00284-4
Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: The state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8
Delgado, N., Campo Carrasco, L., Etxabe Urbieta, J. M., & Sainz de la Maza San José, M. (2024). Aplicación de la inteligencia artificial en educación: Beneficios y limitaciones percibidos por el profesorado de educación primaria, secundaria y superior. Revista Electrónica Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 27(1), 207–224. https://doi.org/10.6018/reifop.577211
Farrokhnia, M., Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., & Wals, A. (2024). A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(3), 460–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2195846
Grassini, S. (2023). Shaping the future of education: Exploring the potential and consequences of AI and ChatGPT in educational settings. Education Sciences, 13(7), 692. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070692
Guo, H. (2022). Research on the construction of the quality evaluation model system for the teaching reform of physical education students in colleges and universities under the background of artificial intelligence. Scientific Programming, 2022, 6556631. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6556631
He, Q., Chen, H., & Mo, X. (2024). Practical application of interactive AI technology based on visual analysis in professional system of physical education in universities. Heliyon, 10(3), e24627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24627
Kasneci, E., Seßler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Lai, C. Y., Cheung, K. Y., & Chan, C. S. (2023). Exploring the role of intrinsic motivation in ChatGPT adoption to support active learning: An extension of the technology acceptance model. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5, 100178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100178
Lo, C. K. (2023). What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Education Sciences, 13(4), 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040410
Lo, C. K., Hew, K. F., & Jong, M. S.-Y. (2024). The influence of ChatGPT on student engagement: A systematic review and future research agenda. Computers & Education, 219, 105100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105100
Ogunleye, B., Zakariyyah, K. I., Ajao, O., Olayinka, O., & Sharma, H. (2024). A systematic review of generative AI for teaching and learning practice. Education Sciences, 14(6), 636. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14060636
Rahman, M. M., & Watanobe, Y. (2023). ChatGPT for education and research: Opportunities, threats, and strategies. Applied Sciences, 13(9), 5783. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13095783
Sang, Y., & Chen, X. (2022). Human-computer interactive physical education teaching method based on speech recognition engine technology. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 941083. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.941083
Strzelecki, A. (2024). Students’ acceptance of ChatGPT in higher education: An extended unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Innovative Higher Education, 49(2), 223–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-023-09686-1
Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., & Agyemang, B. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10, 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x
Wang, Y., & Wang, X. (2024). Artificial intelligence in physical education: Comprehensive review and future teacher training strategies. Frontiers in Public Health, 12, 1484848. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1484848
Wu, G., Zhang, X., & Souri, A. (2022). Realization of wireless sensors and intelligent computer aided teaching in physical education and training. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2022, 6415352. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6415352
Xia, Q., Li, W., Yang, Y., Weng, X., & Chiu, T. K. F. (2025). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) on students’ motivation and engagement. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 9, 100455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100455
Yu, H., & Yang, M. (2023). Application model for innovative sports practice teaching in colleges using Internet of Things and artificial intelligence. Electronics, 12(4), 874. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12040874
Zhang, B., Jin, H., & Duan, X. (2022). Physical education movement and comprehensive health quality intervention under the background of artificial intelligence. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 947731. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.947731
Zhou, T., Wu, X., Wang, Y., Wang, Y., & Zhang, S. (2024). Application of artificial intelligence in physical education: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 8203–8220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12128-2
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 Diana Teresa Tunja Castro (Autor/a)
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
