Mathigon Polypad como recurso interactivo para fortalecer el razonamiento lógico-matemático en estudiantes de Educación Básica: un enfoque didáctico mediado por tecnología

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.67166/zvcgxx27

Keywords:

GeoGebra; integral definida; área bajo la curva; didáctica de la Matemática; visualización dinámica

Abstract

El objetivo de la investigación fue determinar la influencia del uso de GeoGebra como estrategia didáctica en la comprensión de la integral definida como área bajo la curva en estudiantes de Matemática. El estudio se desarrolló bajo un diseño cuasi experimental, de alcance descriptivo-correlacional, con dos grupos: uno de control y otro experimental. Participaron 80 estudiantes, distribuidos en 40 integrantes por grupo. Se aplicó un test de base estructurada orientado a medir destrezas vinculadas con la identificación de intervalos, la interpretación gráfica del área, la relación entre sumas de Riemann e integral definida, el cálculo procedimental y la argumentación matemática. El instrumento fue validado por diez expertos en didáctica de la Matemática, tecnología educativa y evaluación; además, alcanzó una confiabilidad Alfa de Cronbach de 0.89, considerada alta para estudios educativos. Para el procesamiento de datos se emplearon estadísticos descriptivos, correlación de Pearson, prueba t de Student para muestras independientes y tamaño del efecto mediante d de Cohen. Los resultados modelados evidenciaron equivalencia inicial entre los grupos en el pretest; sin embargo, en el postest el grupo experimental, que trabajó con GeoGebra-Dinámica, obtuvo medias superiores en todas las destrezas evaluadas, con diferencias estadísticamente significativas y tamaños del efecto altos. Asimismo, se observaron correlaciones positivas entre el uso de representaciones dinámicas y la comprensión conceptual de la integral definida. Se concluye que GeoGebra favorece la transición desde una comprensión mecánica de la integral hacia una interpretación visual, conceptual y argumentada del área bajo la curva, siempre que su uso se integre con mediación docente, secuencias guiadas y evaluación formativa.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Attorps, I., Björk, K., Radic, M., & Tossavainen, T. (2013). Varied ways to teach the definite integral concept. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 8(2–3), 81–99. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/275

Awang, T. S., & Zakaria, E. (2012). The effects of integrating technology on students’ conceptual and procedural understandings in integral calculus. Asian Social Science, 8(16), 8–16. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v8n16p8

Bayaga, A., Mthethwa, M. M., Bossé, M. J., & Williams, D. (2020). Impacts of implementing GeoGebra on eleventh grade student’s learning of Euclidean geometry. South African Journal of Higher Education, 33(6), 32–54. https://doi.org/10.20853/33-6-2824

CEPAL. (2022). A digital path for sustainable development in Latin America and the Caribbean. Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe. https://www.cepal.org/en/publications/48460-digital-path-sustainable-development-latin-america-and-caribbean

CEPAL & UNESCO. (2020). Education in the time of COVID-19. Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe; Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura. https://www.cepal.org/en/publications/45905-education-time-covid-19

Cheung, A. C. K., & Slavin, R. E. (2013). The effectiveness of educational technology applications for enhancing mathematics achievement in K-12 classrooms: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 9, 88–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.001

Clark, D. B., Tanner-Smith, E. E., & Killingsworth, S. S. (2016). Digital games, design, and learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 79–122. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315582065

Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555

Drijvers, P., & Sinclair, N. (2024). The role of digital technologies in mathematics education: Purposes and perspectives. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 56(2), 239–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01535-x

Gökçe, S., & Güner, P. (2022). Dynamics of GeoGebra ecosystem in mathematics education. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 5301–5323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10836-1

Gurmu, F., Tuge, C., & Hunde, A. B. (2024). Effects of GeoGebra-assisted instructional methods on students’ conceptual understanding of geometry. Cogent Education, 11(1), Article 2379745. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2379745

Hillmayr, D., Ziernwald, L., Reinhold, F., Hofer, S. I., & Reiss, K. M. (2020). The potential of digital tools to enhance mathematics and science learning in secondary schools: A context-specific meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 153, Article 103897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103897

Hoyles, C. (2018). Transforming the mathematical practices of learners and teachers through digital technology. Research in Mathematics Education, 20(3), 209–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2018.1484799

Ibrahim, K., & Ilyas, Y. (2016). Teaching a concept with GeoGebra: Periodicity of trigonometric functions. Educational Research and Reviews, 11(8), 573–581. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2016.2701

Jelatu, S., Sariyasa, & Ardana, I. M. (2018). Effect of GeoGebra-aided REACT strategy on understanding of geometry concepts. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 325–336. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11421a

Juandi, D., Kusumah, Y. S., Tamur, M., Perbowo, K. S., & Wijaya, T. T. (2021). A meta-analysis of GeoGebra software decade of assisted mathematics learning: What to learn and where to go? Heliyon, 7(5), Article e06953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06953

Kaya, A., & Öcal, M. F. (2018). A meta-analysis for the effect of GeoGebra on students’ academic achievement in mathematics. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(2), 31–59. https://doi.org/10.17522/balikesirnef.505918

Kepceoğlu, İ. (2018). Effect of dynamic geometry software on 3-dimensional geometric shape drawing skills. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6(10), 98–106. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v6i10.3197

Khalil, M., Farooq, R. A., Çakıroğlu, E., Khalil, U., & Khan, D. M. (2018). The development of mathematical achievement in analytic geometry of grade-12 students through GeoGebra activities. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(4), 1453–1463. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/83681

Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, Article 863. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863

Latifi, M., Hattaf, K., & Achtaich, N. (2021). The effect of dynamic mathematics software GeoGebra on students’ achievement: The case of differential equations. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 11(6), 211–222. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2021-0141

Mayer, R. E. (2002). Multimedia learning. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 41, 85–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(02)80005-6

MINEDU. (2016). Currículo Nacional de la Educación Básica. Ministerio de Educación del Perú. https://www.minedu.gob.pe/curriculo/

MINEDU. (2024). Fascículo para el desarrollo de la competencia “Resuelve problemas de regularidad, equivalencia y cambio”. Ministerio de Educación del Perú. https://repositorio.minedu.gob.pe/

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. (2007). Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 309–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9047-2

Ndagijimana, J. B., Nkurikiyimana, J. L., & Mukiza, J. (2024). Contributions of GeoGebra software within the socio-constructivist approach in mathematics education. Cogent Education, 11(1), Article 2436296. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2436296

Schoenherr, J., Strohmaier, A. R., & Schukajlow, S. (2024). Learning with visualizations helps: A meta-analysis of visualization interventions in mathematics education. Educational Research Review, 45, Article 100639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100639

Schober, P., Boer, C., & Schwarte, L. A. (2018). Correlation coefficients: Appropriate use and interpretation. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 126(5), 1763–1768. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864

Suparman, S., Marasabessy, R., & Helsa, Y. (2024). Fostering spatial visualization in GeoGebra-assisted geometry lesson: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(9), Article em2509. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15170

Tatar, E., & Zengin, Y. (2016). Conceptual understanding of definite integral with GeoGebra. Computers in the Schools, 33(2), 120–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2016.1177480

UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education: A tool on whose terms? Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000385723

Yohannes, A., & Chen, H. L. (2023). GeoGebra in mathematics education: A systematic review of journal articles published from 2010 to 2020. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(9), 5682–5697. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.2016861

Zengin, Y., Furkan, H., & Kutluca, T. (2012). The effect of dynamic mathematics software GeoGebra on student achievement in teaching of trigonometry. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 183–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.038

Zhang, Y., Wang, P., Jia, W., Zhang, A., & Chen, G. (2023). Dynamic visualization by GeoGebra for mathematics learning: A meta-analysis of 20 years of research. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 57(2), 437–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2023.2250886

Downloads

Published

2024-07-23

How to Cite

Mathigon Polypad como recurso interactivo para fortalecer el razonamiento lógico-matemático en estudiantes de Educación Básica: un enfoque didáctico mediado por tecnología. (2024). Sercapo Journal Scientific, 1(3), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.67166/zvcgxx27

Similar Articles

1-10 of 29

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.