PlanSim-AI: diseño y validación de un sistema multiagente para simular estudiantes y optimizar la planificación del aprendizaje en educación superior
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.67166/rbtdte05Palabras clave:
inteligencia artificial; sistema multiagente; planificación del aprendizaje; simulación de estudiantes; educación superior.Resumen
El estudio tuvo como objetivo diseñar y validar PlanSim-AI, un sistema multiagente orientado a simular perfiles heterogéneos de estudiantes y comparar escenarios de planificación del aprendizaje en educación superior. Se planteó un diseño cuasi experimental de enfoque cuantitativo, con alcance descriptivo-correlacional y dos grupos equivalentes de 20 participantes cada uno, distribuidos de manera balanceada en cuatro centros de educación superior codificados. Para esta versión demostrativa se modelaron 40 registros sintéticos y un test estructurado de 24 ítems que evalúa diagnóstico de necesidades, secuenciación adaptativa, toma de decisiones basada en evidencia y evaluación-reajuste de la planificación. El instrumento se estructuró para validación de contenido mediante diez expertos y mostró un parámetro de consistencia interna alfa de Cronbach de .87. El análisis previsto incluyó estadística descriptiva, correlación de Pearson, t de Student para muestras independientes y d de Cohen. En el escenario sintético, el grupo experimental alcanzó un puntaje postest medio de 76.9 (DE=7.2), frente a 64.6 (DE=7.6) del grupo control; la diferencia fue significativa, t(38)=5.25, p<.001, con un efecto grande, d=1.66. La asociación entre el índice de alineación de las recomendaciones de PlanSim-AI y el desempeño postest fue positiva y alta (r=.72). La mayor mejora se observó en secuenciación adaptativa. Se concluye que la arquitectura propuesta es metodológicamente prometedora para apoyar decisiones docentes mediante simulación de escenarios, siempre que su uso mantenga supervisión humana, transparencia y validación externa con muestras reales.
Descargas
Referencias
Alfredo, R., Echeverria, V., Jin, Y., Yan, L., Swiecki, Z., Gašević, D., & Martinez-Maldonado, R. (2024). Human-centred learning analytics and AI in education: A systematic literature review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100215
Alkhadim, G. S. (2022). Cronbach’s alpha and semantic overlap between items. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 815490. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.815490
Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., van Ginkel, S., Macfadyen, L. P., & Biemans, H. J. A. (2022). A systematic review of the role of learning analytics in enhancing feedback practices in higher education. Educational Research Review, 37, 100489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100489
Bond, M., Khosravi, H., De Laat, M., Bergdahl, N., Negrea, V., Oxley, E., Pham, P., Chong, S. W., & Siemens, G. (2024). A meta systematic review of artificial intelligence in higher education: A call for increased ethics, collaboration, and rigour. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21, 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00436-z
Chaka, C. (2023). Fourth industrial revolution—a review of applications, prospects, and challenges for artificial intelligence, robotics and blockchain in higher education. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 18, 2. https://doi.org/10.58459/rptel.2023.18002
Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8
Chu, H.-C., Hwang, G.-H., Tu, Y.-F., & Yang, K.-H. (2022). Roles and research trends of artificial intelligence in higher education: A systematic review of the top 50 most-cited articles. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(3), 22–42. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7526
Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: The state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8
Daoudi, I. (2022). Learning analytics for enhancing the usability of serious games in formal education: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Education and Information Technologies, 27(8), 11237–11266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11087-4
Del Gobbo, E., Guarino, A., Cafarelli, B., Grilli, L., & Limone, P. (2023). Automatic evaluation of open-ended questions for online learning: A systematic mapping. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 77, 101258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2023.101258
Fariani, R. I., Junus, K., & Santoso, H. B. (2023). A systematic literature review on personalised learning in the higher education context. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 28(2), 449–476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-022-09628-4
Farrokhnia, M., Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., & Wals, A. (2024). A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(3), 460–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2195846
Gao, C., Lan, X., Li, N., Yuan, Y., Ding, J., Zhou, Z., Xu, F., & Li, Y. (2024). Large language models empowered agent-based modeling and simulation: A survey and perspectives. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, 1259. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03611-3
Herrera, P., Huepe, M., & Trucco, D. (2025). Educación y desarrollo de competencias digitales en América Latina y el Caribe. Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., … Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Khosravi, H., Shum, S. B., Chen, G., Conati, C., Tsai, Y.-S., Kay, J., Knight, S., Martinez-Maldonado, R., Sadiq, S., & Gašević, D. (2022). Explainable artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100074
Labadze, L., Grigolia, M., & Machaidze, L. (2023). Role of AI chatbots in education: Systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, 56. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00426-1
Lakens, D. (2022). Sample size justification. Collabra: Psychology, 8(1), 33267. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.33267
Lee, D., Arnold, M., Srivastava, A., Plastow, K., Strelan, P., Ploeckl, F., Lekkas, D., & Palmer, E. (2024). The impact of generative AI on higher education learning and teaching: A study of educators’ perspectives. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100221
Lo, C. K. (2023). What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Education Sciences, 13(4), 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040410
Miao, F., & Holmes, W. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO.
Ministerio de Educación del Ecuador. (2024). Orientaciones para el uso pedagógico de herramientas de inteligencia artificial en el proceso de enseñanza aprendizaje que garanticen el uso efectivo y ético en el aula. Ministerio de Educación del Ecuador.
Nguyen, A., Ngo, H. N., Hong, Y., Dang, B., & Nguyen, B.-P. T. (2023). Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in education. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 4221–4241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11316-w
Ouyang, F., Zheng, L., & Jiao, P. (2022). Artificial intelligence in online higher education: A systematic review of empirical research from 2011 to 2020. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 7893–7925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10925-9
Park, J. S., O’Brien, J. C., Cai, C. J., Morris, M. R., Liang, P., & Bernstein, M. S. (2023). Generative agents: Interactive simulacra of human behavior. Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, Article 2, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3586183.3606763
Rabelo, A., Rodrigues, M. W., Nobre, C., Isotani, S., & Zárate, L. (2023). Educational data mining and learning analytics: A review of educational management in e-learning. Information Discovery and Delivery. https://doi.org/10.1108/IDD-10-2022-0099
Rangel-de Lázaro, G., & Duart, J. M. (2023). You can handle, you can teach it: Systematic review on the use of extended reality and artificial intelligence technologies for online higher education. Sustainability, 15(4), 3507. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043507
Salas-Pilco, S. Z., & Yang, Y. (2022). Artificial intelligence applications in Latin American higher education: A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19, 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00326-w
Salas-Pilco, S. Z., Xiao, K., & Hu, X. (2022). Artificial intelligence and learning analytics in teacher education: A systematic review. Education Sciences, 12(8), 569. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12080569
Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., & Agyemang, B. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10, 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x
Ullrich, A., Vladova, G., Eigelshoven, F., & Renz, A. (2022). Data mining of scientific research on artificial intelligence in teaching and administration in higher education institutions: A bibliometrics analysis and recommendation for future research. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-022-00031-7
Wang, L., Ma, C., Feng, X., Zhang, Z., Yang, H., Zhang, J., Chen, Z., Tang, J., Chen, X., Lin, Y., Zhao, W. X., Wei, Z., & Wen, J. (2024a). A survey on large language model based autonomous agents. Frontiers of Computer Science, 18, 186345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-024-40231-1
Wang, N., Wang, X., & Su, Y.-S. (2024b). Critical analysis of the technological affordances, challenges and future directions of generative AI in education: A systematic review. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 44(1), 139–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2024.2305156
Williamson, B. (2024). The social life of AI in education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 34(1), 97–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-023-00342-5
Zakariya, Y. F. (2022). Cronbach’s alpha in mathematics education research: Its appropriateness, overuse, and alternatives in estimating scale reliability. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1074430. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1074430
Zhai, C., Wibowo, S., & Li, L. D. (2024). The effects of over-reliance on AI dialogue systems on students’ cognitive abilities: A systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 11, 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00316-7
Zhong, L. (2022). A systematic review of personalized learning in higher education: Learning content structure, learning materials sequence, and learning readiness support. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2061006
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 Christian Gustavo Masapanta Salazar (Autor/a)
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
