Diseño personalizado de problemas matemáticos para fortalecer el pensamiento lógico en Educación General Básica mediante modelos inteligentes.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.67166/6sjg7108Keywords:
inteligencia artificial generativa; personalización del aprendizaje; pensamiento lógico; resolución de problemas matemáticos; Educación General Básica.Abstract
El estudio examinó el potencial de modelados inteligentes como estrategia didáctica para personalizar problemas matemáticos y fortalecer el pensamiento lógico en estudiantes de Educación General Básica (EGB). El objetivo fue determinar en qué medida una secuencia de aprendizaje mediada por modelos inteligentes, con supervisión docente y tareas ajustadas al nivel de desempeño, favorece el reconocimiento de patrones, la inferencia lógica, la representación de problemas, la selección de estrategias y la justificación de procedimientos. Se planteó un diseño cuasi experimental, cuantitativo y de alcance descriptivo-correlacional, con 40 estudiantes distribuidos en un grupo control y un grupo experimental, procedentes de cuatro centros educativos. La intervención comprendió doce sesiones de cuarenta y cinco minutos durante seis semanas. Se utilizó un test de base estructurada de 30 puntos, validado por juicio de expertos y con una confiabilidad ilustrativa de alfa de Cronbach de 0,90. Para el contraste se consideraron la prueba t de Student para muestras independientes, la correlación de Pearson y el tamaño del efecto d de Cohen. Como escenario estadístico simulado para este borrador, el grupo experimental alcanzó una media postest de 23,2 puntos frente a 17,4 del control; la diferencia resultó significativa, t(38)=6,01, p<0,001, con un efecto grande, d=1,90. La personalización se asoció positivamente con la ganancia de aprendizaje (r=0,72). Se concluye que la IAG puede aportar valor cuando no sustituye el razonamiento del estudiante, sino que diversifica situaciones, gradúa ayudas y promueve verificación crítica. Los resultados numéricos deben reemplazarse por los datos reales antes de cualquier envío editorial.
Downloads
References
Abbas, M., Jam, F. A., & Khan, T. I. (2024). Is it harmful or helpful? Examining the causes and consequences of generative AI usage among university students. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21, 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00444-7
Almarashdi, H. S., Jarrah, A. M., Gningue, S. M., & Khurma, O. A. (2024). Unveiling the potential: A systematic review of ChatGPT in transforming mathematics teaching and learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(12), em2555. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15739
Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8
Chiu, T. K. F. (2024). The impact of generative AI (GenAI) on practices, policies and research direction in education: A case of ChatGPT and Midjourney. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(10), 6187–6203. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2253861
Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe. (2024). Educación y desarrollo de competencias digitales en América Latina y el Caribe. Naciones Unidas.
Eke, D. O. (2023). ChatGPT and the rise of generative AI: Threat to academic integrity? Journal of Responsible Technology, 13, 100060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrt.2023.100060
Ellis, A. R., & Slade, E. (2023). A new era of learning: Considerations for ChatGPT as a tool to enhance statistics and data science education. Journal of Statistics and Data Science Education, 31(2), 128–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/26939169.2023.2223609
Farrokhnia, M., Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., & Wals, A. (2024). A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(3), 460–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2195846
García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2023). The perception of artificial intelligence in educational contexts after the launch of ChatGPT: Disruption or panic? Education in the Knowledge Society, 24, e31279. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.31279
Getenet, S. (2024). Pre-service teachers and ChatGPT in multistrategy problem-solving: Implications for mathematics teaching in primary schools. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 19(1), em0766. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/14141
Govender, R. (2023). The impact of artificial intelligence and the future of ChatGPT for mathematics teaching and learning in schools and higher education. Pythagoras, 44(1), a787. https://doi.org/10.4102/pythagoras.v44i1.787
Halaweh, M. (2023). ChatGPT in education: Strategies for responsible implementation. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(2), ep421. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13036
Jarrah, A. M., Wardat, Y., & Fidalgo, P. (2023). Using ChatGPT in academic writing is (not) a form of plagiarism: What does the literature say? Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 13(4), e202346. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/13572
Jauhiainen, J. S., & Garagorry Guerra, A. (2024). Generative AI and education: Dynamic personalization of pupils’ school learning material with ChatGPT. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1288723. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1288723
Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Singh, R. P., Khan, S., & Khan, I. H. (2023). Unlocking the opportunities through ChatGPT Tool towards ameliorating the education system. BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations, 3(2), 100115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbench.2023.100115
Jia, J., Wang, T., Zhang, Y., & Wang, G. (2024). The comparison of general tips for mathematical problem solving generated by generative AI with those generated by human teachers. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 44(1), 8–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2023.2286920
Karjanto, N. (2023). Investigating difficulties and enhancing understanding in linear algebra: Leveraging SageMath and ChatGPT for (orthogonal) diagonalization and singular value decomposition. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 20(9), 16551–16595. https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2023738
Kasneci, E., Seßler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Khurma, O. A., Albahti, F., Ali, N., & Bustanji, A. (2024). AI ChatGPT and student engagement: Unraveling dimensions through PRISMA analysis for enhanced learning experiences. Contemporary Educational Technology, 16(2), ep503. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/14334
Khurma, O. A., Ali, N., & Hashem, R. (2023). Critical reflections on ChatGPT in UAE education: Navigating equity and governance for safe and effective use. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 18(14), 188–199. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i14.40935
Korkmaz Guler, N., Dertli, Z. G., Boran, E., & Yildiz, B. (2024). An artificial intelligence application in mathematics education: Evaluating ChatGPT’s academic achievement in a mathematics exam. Pedagogical Research, 9(2), em0188. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/14145
Labadze, L., Grigolia, M., & Machaidze, L. (2023). Role of AI chatbots in education: Systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, 56. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00426-1
Lee, D., & Yeo, S. (2022). Developing an AI-based chatbot for practicing responsive teaching in mathematics. Computers & Education, 191, 104646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104646
Lim, W. M., Gunasekara, A., Pallant, J. L., Pallant, J. I., & Pechenkina, E. (2023). Generative AI and the future of education: Ragnarök or reformation? A paradoxical perspective from management educators. The International Journal of Management Education, 21(2), 100790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100790
Lo, C. K. (2023). What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Education Sciences, 13(4), 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040410
Miao, F., & Holmes, W. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO.
Ministerio de Educación del Ecuador. (2022). Guía metodológica de competencias matemáticas. Ministerio de Educación.
Naqvi, W. M., Ganjoo, R., Rowe, M., Pashine, A. A., & Mishra, G. V. (2025). Critical thinking in the age of generative AI: Implications for health sciences education. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 8, 1571527. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2025.1571527
Pavlova, N. H. (2024). Flipped dialogic learning method with ChatGPT: A case study. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 19(1), em0764. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/14025
Pepin, B., Buchholtz, N., & Salinas-Hernández, U. (2025). A scoping survey of ChatGPT in mathematics education. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 11, 9–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-025-00172-1
Seebut, S., Wongsason, P., & Kim, D. (2024). Combining GPT and Colab as learning tools for students to explore the numerical solutions of difference equations. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(1), em2377. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13905
Supriyadi, E., & Kuncoro, K. S. (2023). Exploring the future of mathematics teaching: Insight with ChatGPT. UNION: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 11(2), 305–316. https://doi.org/10.30738/union.v11i2.14898
Udias, A., Alonso-Ayuso, A., Alfaro, C., Algar, M. J., Cuesta, M., Fernández-Isabel, A., Gómez, J., Lancho, C., Cano, E. L., Martín de Diego, I., & Ortega, F. (2024). ChatGPT’s performance in university admissions tests in mathematics. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 19(4), em0795. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/15517
Wahba, F., Ajlouni, A. O., & Abumosa, M. A. (2024). The impact of ChatGPT-based learning statistics on undergraduates’ statistical reasoning and attitudes toward statistics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(7), em2468. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14726
Walter, Y. (2024). Embracing the future of artificial intelligence in the classroom: The relevance of AI literacy, prompt engineering, and critical thinking in modern education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21, 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00448-3
Wardat, Y., Tashtoush, M. A., AlAli, R., & Jarrah, A. M. (2023). ChatGPT: A revolutionary tool for teaching and learning mathematics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(7), em2286. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13272
Zhai, C., Wibowo, S., & Li, L. D. (2024). The effects of over-reliance on AI dialogue systems on students’ cognitive abilities: A systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 11, 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00316-7
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ximena Maribel Machado Vaca, César Augusto Enriquez Álvarez, Ana Victoria Bastidas Freire, Alba Guadalupe Guanotoa Cuyo, Evelyn Johana Quilumba Álvarez (Autor/a)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




